{"id":7,"date":"2020-11-26T09:25:16","date_gmt":"2020-11-26T09:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/our-services\/"},"modified":"2026-03-12T13:35:35","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T13:35:35","slug":"forthcoming-events","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/?page_id=7","title":{"rendered":"Forthcoming Events"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Evenimentul este dedicat memoriei profesorului universitar<\/strong> George Bondor<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u00a0Program<\/a><\/h2>\n

Colocviul Centrului de hermeneutic\u0103, fenomenologie \u0219i filosofie practic\u0103 (edi\u021bia a XVI-a)<\/em>\u00a0propune o dezbatere circumscris\u0103 urm\u0103toarelor \u00eentreb\u0103ri:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Ce leg\u0103turi exist\u0103 \u00eentre spa\u021biu \u0219i filosofie?<\/li>\n
  2. Care sunt modurile situ\u0103rii noastre \u00een spa\u021biu?<\/li>\n
  3. \u00cen ce fel experiment\u0103m \u0219i descriem diversele forme de locuire?<\/li>\n
  4. Cum func\u021bioneaz\u0103 memoria \u00een raport cu spa\u021biul \u0219i locuirea?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Argument<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    Exist\u0103 o rela\u021bie intim\u0103 \u00eentre spa\u021biu \u0219i filosofie. O demonstreaz\u0103, \u00eentre al\u021bii, Nietzsche, Deleuze, Heidegger… Ace\u0219tia a\u0219az\u0103 filosofia \u00een raport cu spa\u021biul \u0219i geografia, argument\u00e2nd complicitatea lor benefic\u0103. \u00cencercarea de tipologizare a spa\u021biilor dezv\u0103luie o diversitate debordant\u0103: avem spa\u021bii \u00eenchise \u0219i deschise, publice \u0219i private, exterioare \u0219i interioare, reale, virtuale, posibile, naturale, idilice, imaginare, artificiale, goale, vide, pustii, labirintice, capcan\u0103, carcerale, imersive. Termeni precum acas\u0103, aici, dincolo, proximitate, dep\u0103rtare, origine, exil, natur\u0103, peisaj, lume, cosmos <\/em>au, f\u0103r\u0103 doar \u0219i poate, conota\u021bii spa\u021biale.<\/p>\n

    Spa\u021biul <\/em>poate func\u021biona ca un dat a priori,<\/em> \u00een sens kantian, condi\u021bion\u00e2ndu-ne experien\u021ba, dar poate fi \u0219i orizontul \u00een care experien\u021ba \u00eens\u0103\u0219i este efectiv\u0103. Spa\u021biul ofer\u0103 cadrul, iar locuirea<\/em> reprezint\u0103 modul \u00een care oamenii dau \u201esens\u201d, transform\u00e2ndu-l \u00eentr-un mediu personal, social \u0219i cultural. Rela\u021bia dintre cele dou\u0103 este dinamic\u0103, func\u021bie de context, experien\u021b\u0103, interpretare. Spa\u021biul nu este doar un mediu fizic, ci \u0219i unul simbolic, cultural \u0219i psihologic, model\u00e2nd felul \u00een care g\u00e2ndim, sim\u021bim, ac\u021bion\u0103m, ne construim identitatea.<\/p>\n

    Locuirea<\/em> reprezint\u0103 felul concret \u00een care oamenii se raporteaz\u0103 la spa\u021biu. Pentru Heidegger, esen\u021ba construirii este locuirea; oamenii \u201elocuiesc\u201d \u00een spa\u021bii, nu doar le ocup\u0103 fizic. Spa\u021biul devine locuit doar prin interac\u021biunea uman\u0103, prin experien\u021be \u0219i activit\u0103\u021bi care transform\u0103 ceva func\u021bional \u00eentr-un \u201eloc\u201d cu semnifica\u021bie personal\u0103 \u0219i cultural\u0103. Locuirea reflect\u0103 raporturile noastre cu spa\u021biul de care dispunem;\u00a0 nu este doar o experien\u021b\u0103 prezent\u0103, ci \u0219i una care se construie\u0219te pe amintiri, nostalgii, pe dorin\u021ba de re\u00eentoarcere la \u201eob\u00e2r\u0219ii\u201d (r\u0103d\u0103cini, locuri natale), dar \u0219i pe tenta\u021biile de evaziune, deta\u0219are sau fug\u0103. Fenomenologia locuirii ar fi, a\u0219adar, un domeniu care poate contribui la o mai bun\u0103 \u00een\u021belegere a rela\u021biei dintre oameni \u0219i mediile \u00een care tr\u0103iesc.<\/p>\n

    Memoria <\/em>influen\u021beaz\u0103 felul \u00een care percepem \u0219i tr\u0103im spa\u021biile. Locurile \u00een care am locuit sau pe care le-am vizitat devin \u201eancore\u201d pentru amintiri, influen\u021b\u00e2nd felul \u00een care privim \u0219i interpret\u0103m lumea. Ne amintim adesea persoane, locuri, case, ora\u0219e, peisaje care ne-au marcat, care fac parte din \u201eistoria\u201d noastr\u0103 \u0219i continu\u0103 s\u0103 ne influen\u021beze modul de a fi. Actul locuirii implic\u0103 o interac\u021biune cu ceilal\u021bi, cu obiecte, aranjamente \u0219i atmosfere care declan\u0219eaz\u0103 \u0219i sus\u021bin memoria personal\u0103.<\/p>\n

    Rela\u021biile dintre spa\u021biu, locuire \u0219i memorie sunt intime \u0219i profunde; spa\u021biul nu este un fundal neutru, nici un cadru existen\u021bial indiferent, ci un reper decisiv \u00een experien\u021ba subiectiv\u0103 a locuirii. Semnifica\u021biile locuirii nu sunt epuizate de referin\u021bele \u201espa\u021biale\u201d sau arhitecturale; putem \u201elocui\u201d \u00een imagina\u021bie, \u00een trecut, \u00een viitor, \u00een propriile prejudec\u0103\u021bi, \u00een g\u00e2ndirea altora, \u00een sufletul sau inima cuiva drag, \u00een noi \u00een\u0219ine… Memoria, la r\u00e2ndu-i, poate fi leg\u0103tura dintre oameni \u0219i spa\u021biul lor, transform\u00e2ndu-l \u00eentr-un \u201eloc\u201d cu semnifica\u021bii personale, sociale \u0219i culturale.<\/p>\n

    \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Evenimentul este dedicat memoriei profesorului universitar George Bondor \u00a0Program Colocviul Centrului de hermeneutic\u0103, fenomenologie \u0219i filosofie practic\u0103 (edi\u021bia a XVI-a)\u00a0propune o dezbatere circumscris\u0103 urm\u0103toarelor \u00eentreb\u0103ri: Ce leg\u0103turi exist\u0103 \u00eentre spa\u021biu \u0219i filosofie? Care sunt modurile situ\u0103rii noastre \u00een spa\u021biu? \u00cen … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":317,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":361,"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions\/361"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/317"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/centerhermeneutics.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}